AIM vs CELC: Correlation
AIM ImmunoTech Inc. (AIM) and Celcuity Inc. (CELC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.29.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AIM and CELC?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AIM and CELC correlate at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.25, with an annualized covariance of -4375.8 %².
Out of 12 assets tracked against AIM, CELC lands near the bottom at #11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CELC outperformed by 176.3 percentage points (-89.7% for AIM against +86.6% for CELC).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AIM vs CELC: side by side
| AIM (AIM ImmunoTech Inc.) | CELC (Celcuity Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -89.7% | +86.6% |
| 5-year return | -99.9% | +324.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 120.5% | 124.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.08 | 0.76 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.7% | -62.0% |
| Market cap | – | $4.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AIM | CELC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -66.3% | +6.2% |
| 2023 | +41.9% | +4.0% |
| 2024 | -54.5% | -10.2% |
| 2025 | -94.4% | +662.0% |
| 2026 | -77.2% | -6.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AIM and CELC good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, AIM and CELC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AIM and CELC?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AIM and CELC is -0.29 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.25 over 5 years.
Is CELC a good diversifier for AIM?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, AIM and CELC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?
A reading of -0.29 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aim-vs-celc.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aim-vs-celc/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AIM correlations · CELC correlations
