PairBook
HomeAIHS › AIHS vs SJM

AIHS vs SJM: Correlation

How closely do Senmiao Technology Limited (AIHS) and J.M. Smucker Company (The) (SJM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.25, which is weak.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.25
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
568.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AIHS and SJM?

On 3 years of weekly data the AIHS/SJM correlation comes out at 0.25, weak. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.19) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.17, and annualized covariance runs at 568.2 %².

Among the 19 assets we track against AIHS, SJM ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SJM ahead by 88.2 points (-58.3% versus +29.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: AIHS runs 3.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AIHS vs SJM: side by side

AIHS (Senmiao Technology Limited)SJM (J.M. Smucker Company (The))
1-year return-58.3%+29.9%
5-year return-97.9%+28.2%
Volatility (ann.)85.8%26.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.010.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.0%-32.5%
Market cap$14.1B
P/E (trailing)61.3
Dividend yield0.00%3.38%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: SJM 3.38% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SJM -32.5% vs -93.0%Higher 5y return: SJM +28.2% vs -97.9%
-58%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). AIHS · SJM

Year-by-year returns

YearAIHSSJM
2022-75.6%+20.1%
2023-54.6%-17.8%
2024+161.0%-9.6%
2025-90.0%-7.6%
2026+22.4%+38.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AIHS and SJM good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.25, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AIHS and SJM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.25 over 3 years, with 0.19 over the last year and 0.17 over 5 years.

Is SJM a good diversifier for AIHS?

A fair diversifier. At 0.25, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.25 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aihs-vs-sjm.json

AIHS vs SJM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.25AIHS vs SJM0.25

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AIHS vs SJM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/aihs-vs-sjm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aihs-vs-sjm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AIHS correlations · SJM correlations