PairBook
HomeAHCO › AHCO vs CELZ

AHCO vs CELZ: Correlation

AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) and Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. (CELZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1600.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AHCO and CELZ?

Over the past 3 years, AHCO and CELZ moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.59) than the 3-year average (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.11, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1600.8 %².

Within AHCO's tracked universe of 21 assets, CELZ comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AHCO ahead by 27.8 points (-37.0% versus -64.8%). Risk is not evenly split, since CELZ carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AHCO vs CELZ: side by side

AHCO (AdaptHealth Corp.)CELZ (Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-37.0%-64.8%
5-year return-75.6%-99.2%
Volatility (ann.)62.0%107.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.401.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.0%-89.9%
Market cap$0.8B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: AHCO -61.0% vs -89.9%Higher 5y return: AHCO -75.6% vs -99.2%
-80%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). AHCO · CELZ

Year-by-year returns

YearAHCOCELZ
2022-21.4%-82.8%
2023-62.1%+21.0%
2024+30.6%-49.9%
2025+4.6%-15.2%
2026-41.8%-41.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AHCO and CELZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AHCO and CELZ?

The AHCO/CELZ correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.59, 5 years: -0.11), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CELZ a good diversifier for AHCO?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ahco-vs-celz.json

AHCO vs CELZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24AHCO vs CELZ-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AHCO vs CELZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ahco-vs-celz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ahco-vs-celz/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AHCO correlations · CELZ correlations