PairBook
HomeAFJK › AFJK vs TMUS

AFJK vs TMUS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd (AFJK) and T-Mobile US (TMUS) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1027.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AFJK and TMUS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AFJK and TMUS correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.30 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1027.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, TMUS places #14 of the 29 assets tracked against AFJK. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AFJK ahead by 36.4 points (+8.4% versus -28.0%). One caveat on sizing: AFJK is 8.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AFJK vs TMUS: side by side

AFJK (Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd)TMUS (T-Mobile US)
1-year return+8.4%-28.0%
5-year returnn/a+34.8%
Volatility (ann.)197.3%24.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.180.36
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.8%-37.1%
Market cap$190.7B
P/E (trailing)174.318.8
Dividend yield0.00%2.27%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Lower P/E: TMUS 18.8 vs 174.3Higher yield: TMUS 2.27% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TMUS -37.1% vs -86.8%
-31%0%+574%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AFJK · TMUS

Year-by-year returns

YearAFJKTMUS
2022+20.7%
2023+15.0%
2024+39.7%
2025+498.2%-6.6%
2026-80.9%-11.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AFJK and TMUS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AFJK and TMUS?

The AFJK/TMUS correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.30, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TMUS a good diversifier for AFJK?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/afjk-vs-tmus.json

AFJK vs TMUS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20AFJK vs TMUS-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![AFJK vs TMUS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/afjk-vs-tmus.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/afjk-vs-tmus/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AFJK correlations · TMUS correlations