PairBook
HomeAFJK › AFJK vs CMBT

AFJK vs CMBT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd (AFJK) and CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1783.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AFJK and CMBT?

Over the past 3 years, AFJK and CMBT moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.36) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1783.5 %².

Within AFJK's tracked universe of 29 assets, CMBT comes in at #16 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CMBT outperformed by 135.6 percentage points (+8.4% for AFJK against +144.0% for CMBT). Note the risk asymmetry: AFJK runs 5.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AFJK vs CMBT: side by side

AFJK (Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd)CMBT (CMB.TECH NV)
1-year return+8.4%+144.0%
5-year returnn/a+306.2%
Volatility (ann.)197.3%38.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.180.67
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.8%-57.2%
Market cap$5.3B
P/E (trailing)174.310.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: CMBT 10.2 vs 174.3Smaller drawdown: CMBT -57.2% vs -86.8%
-29%0%+574%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AFJK · CMBT

Year-by-year returns

YearAFJKCMBT
2022+93.2%
2023+26.3%
2024-22.7%
2025+498.2%-2.8%
2026-80.9%+100.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AFJK and CMBT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, AFJK and CMBT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AFJK and CMBT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.36 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is CMBT a good diversifier for AFJK?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, AFJK and CMBT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/afjk-vs-cmbt.json

AFJK vs CMBT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23AFJK vs CMBT-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![AFJK vs CMBT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/afjk-vs-cmbt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/afjk-vs-cmbt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AFJK correlations · CMBT correlations