AFCG vs S: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S) carry a correlation of 0.41, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AFCG and S?
On 3 years of weekly data the AFCG/S correlation comes out at 0.41, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.51) than the 3-year average (0.41). The 5-year figure is 0.32, and annualized covariance runs at 897.8 %².
Within AFCG's tracked universe of 10 assets, S comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: S led by 58.9 percentage points, -26.5% for AFCG against +32.4% for S.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AFCG vs S: side by side
| AFCG (Advanced Flower Capital Inc.) | S (SentinelOne, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -26.5% | +32.4% |
| 5-year return | -55.2% | -65.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 45.5% | 48.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.01 | 1.43 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -76.9% | -60.2% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $7.8B |
| P/E (trailing) | 18.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 7.25% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AFCG | S |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -21.2% | -71.1% |
| 2023 | -10.5% | +88.1% |
| 2024 | +18.7% | -19.1% |
| 2025 | -61.9% | -32.4% |
| 2026 | +25.0% | +51.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AFCG and S good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.41 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AFCG and S?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AFCG and S is 0.41 over 3 years, 0.51 over 1 year and 0.32 over 5 years.
Is S a good diversifier for AFCG?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.41 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.41 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/afcg-vs-s.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/afcg-vs-s/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AFCG correlations · S correlations
