PairBook
HomeAFB › AFB vs MFM

AFB vs MFM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund Inc (AFB) and Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund (MFM) carry a correlation of 0.83, a very strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.83
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.82
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.74
long-run
Ann. covariance
132.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AFB and MFM?

On 3 years of weekly data the AFB/MFM correlation comes out at 0.83, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.82 over 1 year against 0.83 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.74, and annualized covariance runs at 132.6 %².

Among the 24 assets we track against AFB, MFM ranks #6 by 3-year correlation. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +10.5% for AFB and +11.2% for MFM.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AFB vs MFM: side by side

AFB (AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund Inc)MFM (Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund)
1-year return+10.5%+11.2%
5-year return-9.9%-4.9%
Volatility (ann.)12.6%12.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.260.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-15.1%-11.7%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)13.613.1
Dividend yield4.97%5.25%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: MFM 13.1 vs 13.6Higher yield: MFM 5.25% vs 4.97%Smaller drawdown: MFM -11.7% vs -15.1%Higher 5y return: MFM -4.9% vs -9.9%
0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). AFB · MFM

Year-by-year returns

YearAFBMFM
2022-25.9%-22.6%
2023+7.5%+4.2%
2024+4.1%+8.5%
2025+4.4%+7.0%
2026+4.6%+3.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AFB and MFM good diversifiers for each other?

Not really. At 0.83, the two trade almost as one position, and owning both buys little extra protection.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AFB and MFM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.83 over 3 years, with 0.82 over the last year and 0.74 over 5 years.

Is MFM a good diversifier for AFB?

Not really. At 0.83, the two trade almost as one position, and owning both buys little extra protection.

What does a correlation of 0.83 mean?

A reading of 0.83 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/afb-vs-mfm.json

AFB vs MFM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.83AFB vs MFM0.83

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![AFB vs MFM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/afb-vs-mfm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/afb-vs-mfm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AFB correlations · MFM correlations