PairBook
HomeAESI › AESI vs MCD

AESI vs MCD: Correlation

Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. (AESI) and McDonald's (MCD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-178.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AESI and MCD?

On 3 years of weekly data the AESI/MCD correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.35) than the 3-year average (-0.19). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -178.2 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against AESI, MCD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AESI ahead by 25.6 points (+11.1% versus -14.5%). Note the risk asymmetry: AESI runs 3.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AESI vs MCD: side by side

AESI (Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.)MCD (McDonald's)
1-year return+11.1%-14.5%
5-year returnn/a+23.3%
Volatility (ann.)52.7%17.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.020.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-65.9%-22.8%
Market cap$1.6B$184.0B
P/E (trailing)21.7
Dividend yield2.07%2.75%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: MCD 2.75% vs 2.07%Smaller drawdown: MCD -22.8% vs -65.9%
-24%0%+77%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AESI · MCD

Year-by-year returns

YearAESIMCD
2022+0.5%
2023+15.1%
2024+34.6%+0.1%
2025-55.3%+7.9%
2026+38.0%-13.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AESI and MCD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AESI and MCD?

The AESI/MCD correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.35, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MCD a good diversifier for AESI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aesi-vs-mcd.json

AESI vs MCD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19AESI vs MCD-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![AESI vs MCD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/aesi-vs-mcd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aesi-vs-mcd/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AESI correlations · MCD correlations