AEF vs FNGD: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund, Inc. (AEF) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) carry a correlation of -0.57, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AEF and FNGD?
On 3 years of weekly data the AEF/FNGD correlation comes out at -0.57, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.55) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.58, and annualized covariance runs at -1023.5 %².
FNGD is close to the least connected end of AEF's tracked universe, ranking #21 of 21. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AEF ahead by 125.1 points (+69.4% versus -55.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: FNGD runs 3.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AEF vs FNGD: side by side
| AEF (abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund, Inc.) | FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +69.4% | -55.7% |
| 5-year return | +66.6% | -99.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 23.7% | 75.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.08 | -4.54 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -20.0% | -97.6% |
| Market cap | $0.4B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 4.1 | 20.6 |
| Dividend yield | 6.80% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AEF | FNGD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -29.6% | +52.2% |
| 2023 | +7.1% | -90.1% |
| 2024 | +9.4% | -76.6% |
| 2025 | +50.2% | -61.4% |
| 2026 | +41.8% | -49.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AEF and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.57, AEF and FNGD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AEF and FNGD?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AEF and FNGD is -0.57 over 3 years, -0.55 over 1 year and -0.58 over 5 years.
Is FNGD a good diversifier for AEF?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.57, AEF and FNGD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.57 mean?
A reading of -0.57 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aef-vs-fngd.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aef-vs-fngd/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AEF correlations · FNGD correlations
