ADTN vs VXZ: Correlation
ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.35.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ADTN and VXZ?
On 3 years of weekly data the ADTN/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.26 over 1 year against -0.35 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.32, and annualized covariance runs at -500.7 %².
Out of 12 assets tracked against ADTN, VXZ lands near the bottom at #11. Their 12-month results are close: -16.6% for ADTN against -16.1% for VXZ. Note the risk asymmetry: ADTN runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ADTN vs VXZ: side by side
| ADTN (ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -16.6% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | -60.1% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 56.4% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.55 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -61.3% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $0.6B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ADTN | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -16.3% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | -59.9% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +13.5% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +4.3% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | -10.4% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ADTN and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.35 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ADTN and VXZ?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.35 over 3 years, with -0.26 over the last year and -0.32 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for ADTN?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.35 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/adtn-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/adtn-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ADTN correlations · VXZ correlations
