ADNT vs BC: Correlation
Adient plc (ADNT) and Brunswick Corporation (BC) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.59.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ADNT and BC?
On 3 years of weekly data the ADNT/BC correlation comes out at 0.59, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.57 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.58, and annualized covariance runs at 907.0 %².
BC is one of the assets that tracks ADNT most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 16 assets we track against ADNT. The last year tells two different stories: BC led by 48.0 percentage points, -26.3% for ADNT against +21.7% for BC.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ADNT vs BC: side by side
| ADNT (Adient plc) | BC (Brunswick Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -26.3% | +21.7% |
| 5-year return | -53.1% | -15.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 43.0% | 35.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.05 | 1.22 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -74.4% | -56.5% |
| Market cap | $1.5B | $5.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | 34.2 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.18% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ADNT | BC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.5% | -27.1% |
| 2023 | +4.8% | +36.9% |
| 2024 | -52.6% | -31.8% |
| 2025 | +11.3% | +18.1% |
| 2026 | -1.8% | +6.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ADNT and BC good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.59 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ADNT and BC?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.59 over 3 years, with 0.57 over the last year and 0.58 over 5 years.
Is BC a good diversifier for ADNT?
To a limited degree. At 0.59 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.59 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.59 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/adnt-vs-bc.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/adnt-vs-bc/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ADNT correlations · BC correlations
