ACHV vs IMDX: Correlation
Achieve Life Sciences, Inc. (ACHV) and Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. (IMDX) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.35.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ACHV and IMDX?
On 3 years of weekly data the ACHV/IMDX correlation comes out at 0.35, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.49) runs above the 3-year figure (0.35). The 5-year figure is 0.38, and annualized covariance runs at 2574.8 %².
Among the 13 assets we track against ACHV, IMDX ranks #8 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ACHV outperformed by 101.5 percentage points (+174.5% for ACHV against +73.0% for IMDX).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ACHV vs IMDX: side by side
| ACHV (Achieve Life Sciences, Inc.) | IMDX (Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +174.5% | +73.0% |
| 5-year return | +3.2% | -94.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 81.5% | 89.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.08 | 1.02 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -66.2% | -69.9% |
| Market cap | $0.8B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ACHV | IMDX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -68.5% | -85.2% |
| 2023 | +68.2% | -61.1% |
| 2024 | -14.6% | -4.8% |
| 2025 | +41.2% | +215.1% |
| 2026 | +64.6% | -42.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ACHV and IMDX good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.35 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ACHV and IMDX?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ACHV and IMDX is 0.35 over 3 years, 0.49 over 1 year and 0.38 over 5 years.
Is IMDX a good diversifier for ACHV?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.35 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?
A reading of 0.35 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/achv-vs-imdx.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/achv-vs-imdx/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ACHV correlations · IMDX correlations