PairBook
HomeACHC › ACHC vs ISBA

ACHC vs ISBA: Correlation

Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) and Isabella Bank Corporation (ISBA) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-390.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACHC and ISBA?

Over the past 3 years, ACHC and ISBA moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.17, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -390.2 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against ACHC, ISBA lands near the bottom at #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ACHC ahead by 19.8 points (+36.2% versus +16.4%). One caveat on sizing: ACHC is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACHC vs ISBA: side by side

ACHC (Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.)ISBA (Isabella Bank Corporation)
1-year return+36.2%+16.4%
5-year return-54.4%+104.9%
Volatility (ann.)58.4%33.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.620.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.6%-34.1%
Market cap$2.8B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)14.2
Dividend yield0.00%2.91%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: ISBA 2.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ISBA -34.1% vs -86.6%Higher 5y return: ISBA +104.9% vs -54.4%
-51%0%+79%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ACHC · ISBA

Year-by-year returns

YearACHCISBA
2022+35.6%-3.5%
2023-5.5%-3.5%
2024-49.0%+27.7%
2025-64.2%+99.1%
2026+113.0%-21.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACHC and ISBA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACHC and ISBA?

The ACHC/ISBA correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: -0.17), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ISBA a good diversifier for ACHC?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/achc-vs-isba.json

ACHC vs ISBA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20ACHC vs ISBA-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ACHC vs ISBA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/achc-vs-isba.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/achc-vs-isba/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACHC correlations · ISBA correlations