PairBook
HomeACGL › ACGL vs PLBY

ACGL vs PLBY: Correlation

Arch Capital Group (ACGL) and Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.14
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-392.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACGL and PLBY?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ACGL and PLBY correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.14) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.12, with an annualized covariance of -392.2 %².

Within ACGL's tracked universe of 36 assets, PLBY comes in at #26 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ACGL ahead by 36.3 points (+7.7% versus -28.6%). One caveat on sizing: PLBY is 4.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACGL vs PLBY: side by side

ACGL (Arch Capital Group)PLBY (Playboy, Inc.)
1-year return+7.7%-28.6%
5-year return+151.8%-95.1%
Volatility (ann.)21.5%87.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.281.39
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.4%-66.5%
Market cap$33.7B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)7.960.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: ACGL 7.9 vs 60.0Smaller drawdown: ACGL -22.4% vs -66.5%Higher 5y return: ACGL +151.8% vs -95.1%
-36%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ACGL · PLBY

Year-by-year returns

YearACGLPLBY
2022+41.2%-89.7%
2023+18.3%-63.6%
2024+30.8%+46.0%
2025+3.9%+28.8%
2026+3.0%-36.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACGL and PLBY good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, ACGL and PLBY have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACGL and PLBY?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.14 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is PLBY a good diversifier for ACGL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, ACGL and PLBY have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acgl-vs-plby.json

ACGL vs PLBY: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21ACGL vs PLBY-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ACGL vs PLBY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/acgl-vs-plby.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acgl-vs-plby/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACGL correlations · PLBY correlations