ACGL vs BRFH: Correlation
Arch Capital Group (ACGL) and Barfresh Food Group Inc. (BRFH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ACGL and BRFH?
On 3 years of weekly data the ACGL/BRFH correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.16, and annualized covariance runs at -460.6 %².
Within ACGL's tracked universe of 36 assets, BRFH comes in at #25 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ACGL ahead by 68.3 points (+7.7% versus -60.6%). Risk is not evenly split, since BRFH carries 4.7 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ACGL vs BRFH: side by side
| ACGL (Arch Capital Group) | BRFH (Barfresh Food Group Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +7.7% | -60.6% |
| 5-year return | +151.8% | -78.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 21.5% | 101.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.28 | 0.79 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -22.4% | -72.9% |
| Market cap | $33.7B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 7.9 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Financials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ACGL | BRFH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +41.2% | -80.2% |
| 2023 | +18.3% | +22.3% |
| 2024 | +30.8% | +84.9% |
| 2025 | +3.9% | -0.3% |
| 2026 | +3.0% | -56.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ACGL and BRFH good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ACGL and BRFH?
The ACGL/BRFH correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: -0.16), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is BRFH a good diversifier for ACGL?
Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acgl-vs-brfh.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acgl-vs-brfh/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ACGL correlations · BRFH correlations
