PairBook
HomeACGL › ACGL vs BLDP

ACGL vs BLDP: Correlation

How closely do Arch Capital Group (ACGL) and Ballard Power Systems, Inc. (BLDP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-307.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACGL and BLDP?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ACGL and BLDP correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.40) than the 3-year average (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.07, with an annualized covariance of -307.4 %².

Within ACGL's tracked universe of 36 assets, BLDP comes in at #28 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance BLDP holds a 8.1-point edge, +7.7% against +15.8%. One caveat on sizing: BLDP is 3.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACGL vs BLDP: side by side

ACGL (Arch Capital Group)BLDP (Ballard Power Systems, Inc.)
1-year return+7.7%+15.8%
5-year return+151.8%-85.8%
Volatility (ann.)21.5%66.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.281.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.4%-76.4%
Market cap$33.7B$0.7B
P/E (trailing)7.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ACGL -22.4% vs -76.4%Higher 5y return: ACGL +151.8% vs -85.8%
-6%0%+216%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ACGL · BLDP

Year-by-year returns

YearACGLBLDP
2022+41.2%-61.9%
2023+18.3%-22.8%
2024+30.8%-55.1%
2025+3.9%+53.0%
2026+3.0%-7.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACGL and BLDP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACGL and BLDP?

The ACGL/BLDP correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.40, 5 years: -0.07), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is BLDP a good diversifier for ACGL?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acgl-vs-bldp.json

ACGL vs BLDP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22ACGL vs BLDP-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ACGL vs BLDP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/acgl-vs-bldp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acgl-vs-bldp/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACGL correlations · BLDP correlations