ACCO vs PRG: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO) and PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) carry a correlation of 0.61, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ACCO and PRG?
Over the past 3 years, ACCO and PRG moved with a correlation of 0.61, which is strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.69 over 1 year against 0.61 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.56, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1157.7 %².
Among the 22 assets we track against ACCO, PRG ranks #4 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +17.8% against +13.9%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ACCO vs PRG: side by side
| ACCO (Acco Brands Corporation) | PRG (PROG Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +17.8% | +13.9% |
| 5-year return | -36.8% | -13.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 40.3% | 46.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.19 | 1.07 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -50.0% | -51.9% |
| Market cap | $0.4B | $1.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 6.8 | 12.8 |
| Dividend yield | 7.16% | 1.36% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ACCO | PRG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -29.2% | -62.6% |
| 2023 | +15.3% | +83.0% |
| 2024 | -8.7% | +38.4% |
| 2025 | -23.1% | -29.0% |
| 2026 | +22.5% | +36.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ACCO and PRG good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.61 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ACCO and PRG?
The ACCO/PRG correlation stands at 0.61 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.69, 5 years: 0.56), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is PRG a good diversifier for ACCO?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.61 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.61 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.61 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acco-vs-prg.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acco-vs-prg/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ACCO correlations · PRG correlations
