PairBook
HomeABUS › ABUS vs FDMT

ABUS vs FDMT: Correlation

How closely do Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (ABUS) and 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. (FDMT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.41, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.41
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.39
long-run
Ann. covariance
1536.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ABUS and FDMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ABUS and FDMT correlate at 0.41, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.49) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.39, with an annualized covariance of 1536.1 %².

Few assets follow ABUS as closely as FDMT, which ranks #3 of 11 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: FDMT led by 89.2 percentage points, +41.6% for ABUS against +130.8% for FDMT. One caveat on sizing: FDMT is 2.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ABUS vs FDMT: side by side

ABUS (Arbutus Biopharma Corporation)FDMT (4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+41.6%+130.8%
5-year return+53.0%-50.9%
Volatility (ann.)41.5%89.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.461.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.8%-93.0%
Market cap$1.0B$0.8B
P/E (trailing)6.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ABUS -36.8% vs -93.0%Higher 5y return: ABUS +53.0% vs -50.9%
-9%0%+118%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ABUS · FDMT

Year-by-year returns

YearABUSFDMT
2022-40.1%+1.2%
2023+7.3%-8.8%
2024+30.8%-72.5%
2025+47.1%+34.6%
2026+7.5%+98.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ABUS and FDMT good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.41, ABUS and FDMT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ABUS and FDMT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ABUS and FDMT is 0.41 over 3 years, 0.49 over 1 year and 0.39 over 5 years.

Is FDMT a good diversifier for ABUS?

Reasonably. At 0.41, ABUS and FDMT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/abus-vs-fdmt.json

ABUS vs FDMT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.41ABUS vs FDMT0.41

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ABUS vs FDMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/abus-vs-fdmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/abus-vs-fdmt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ABUS correlations · FDMT correlations