PairBook
HomeABTS › ABTS vs SMSI

ABTS vs SMSI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Abits Group Inc (ABTS) and Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.08
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-13244.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ABTS and SMSI?

On 3 years of weekly data the ABTS/SMSI correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.08 versus -0.20 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -13244.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, SMSI places #21 of the 48 assets tracked against ABTS. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SMSI outperformed by 45.5 percentage points (-64.4% for ABTS against -18.9% for SMSI). Note the risk asymmetry: ABTS runs 7.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ABTS vs SMSI: side by side

ABTS (Abits Group Inc)SMSI (Smith Micro Software, Inc.)
1-year return-64.4%-18.9%
5-year return-81.7%-98.5%
Volatility (ann.)689.2%94.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.020.95
Max drawdown (3Y)-92.1%-96.8%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ABTS -92.1% vs -96.8%Higher 5y return: ABTS -81.7% vs -98.5%
-75%0%+192%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ABTS · SMSI

Year-by-year returns

YearABTSSMSI
2022-84.2%-57.3%
2023+152.8%-60.5%
2024-39.6%-80.3%
2025+647.5%-58.8%
2026-73.8%+9.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ABTS and SMSI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, ABTS and SMSI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ABTS and SMSI?

The ABTS/SMSI correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.08, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SMSI a good diversifier for ABTS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, ABTS and SMSI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/abts-vs-smsi.json

ABTS vs SMSI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20ABTS vs SMSI-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ABTS vs SMSI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/abts-vs-smsi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/abts-vs-smsi/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ABTS correlations · SMSI correlations