PairBook
HomeABTS › ABTS vs LMNR

ABTS vs LMNR: Correlation

Abits Group Inc (ABTS) and Limoneira Co (LMNR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-6107.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ABTS and LMNR?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ABTS and LMNR correlate at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.04) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.28). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.18, with an annualized covariance of -6107.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, LMNR places #42 of the 48 assets tracked against ABTS. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LMNR ahead by 50.2 points (-64.4% versus -14.2%). Risk is not evenly split, since ABTS carries 21.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ABTS vs LMNR: side by side

ABTS (Abits Group Inc)LMNR (Limoneira Co)
1-year return-64.4%-14.2%
5-year return-81.7%-8.4%
Volatility (ann.)689.2%32.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.020.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-92.1%-58.1%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%1.67%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LMNR 1.67% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LMNR -58.1% vs -92.1%Higher 5y return: LMNR -8.4% vs -81.7%
-75%0%+192%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ABTS · LMNR

Year-by-year returns

YearABTSLMNR
2022-84.2%-16.7%
2023+152.8%+72.0%
2024-39.6%+20.2%
2025+647.5%-47.3%
2026-73.8%+7.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ABTS and LMNR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, ABTS and LMNR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ABTS and LMNR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ABTS and LMNR is -0.28 over 3 years, -0.04 over 1 year and -0.18 over 5 years.

Is LMNR a good diversifier for ABTS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, ABTS and LMNR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/abts-vs-lmnr.json

ABTS vs LMNR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28ABTS vs LMNR-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ABTS vs LMNR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/abts-vs-lmnr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/abts-vs-lmnr/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ABTS correlations · LMNR correlations