PairBook
HomeABT › ABT vs EMPD

ABT vs EMPD: Correlation

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Empery Digital Inc. (EMPD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.26
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-648.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ABT and EMPD?

On 3 years of weekly data the ABT/EMPD correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.26 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -648.6 %².

Within ABT's tracked universe of 29 assets, EMPD comes in at #24 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: ABT led by 42.2 percentage points, -13.2% for ABT against -55.4% for EMPD. Note the risk asymmetry: EMPD runs 6.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ABT vs EMPD: side by side

ABT (Abbott Laboratories)EMPD (Empery Digital Inc.)
1-year return-13.2%-55.4%
5-year return-2.3%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)22.0%135.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.161.57
Max drawdown (3Y)-39.6%-100.0%
Market cap$193.1B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)37.03.8
Dividend yield2.17%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Lower P/E: EMPD 3.8 vs 37.0Higher yield: ABT 2.17% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ABT -39.6% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: ABT -2.3% vs -100.0%
-59%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ABT · EMPD

Year-by-year returns

YearABTEMPD
2022-20.7%-90.6%
2023+2.3%-98.0%
2024+4.8%-99.9%
2025+12.9%-86.9%
2026-9.3%-31.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ABT and EMPD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ABT and EMPD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.26 over the last year and -0.14 over 5 years.

Is EMPD a good diversifier for ABT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/abt-vs-empd.json

ABT vs EMPD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22ABT vs EMPD-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ABT vs EMPD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/abt-vs-empd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/abt-vs-empd/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ABT correlations · EMPD correlations