PairBook
HomeAAPL › AAPL vs ALMS

AAPL vs ALMS: Correlation

How closely do Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Alumis Inc. (ALMS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-784.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AAPL and ALMS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AAPL and ALMS correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -784.3 %².

Within AAPL's tracked universe of 32 assets, ALMS comes in at #27 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ALMS outperformed by 334.7 percentage points (+37.0% for AAPL against +371.7% for ALMS). One caveat on sizing: ALMS is 4.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AAPL vs ALMS: side by side

AAPL (Apple Inc.)ALMS (Alumis Inc.)
1-year return+37.0%+371.7%
5-year return+110.6%n/a
Volatility (ann.)27.2%130.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.06-1.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-33.4%-78.9%
Market cap$4,591.0B$3.0B
P/E (trailing)36.1
Dividend yield0.33%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Higher yield: AAPL 0.33% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: AAPL -33.4% vs -78.9%
-11%0%+558%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AAPL · ALMS

Year-by-year returns

YearAAPLALMS
2022-26.4%
2023+49.0%
2024+30.7%
2025+9.1%+24.2%
2026+16.0%+137.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AAPL and ALMS good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AAPL and ALMS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AAPL and ALMS is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is ALMS a good diversifier for AAPL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aapl-vs-alms.json

AAPL vs ALMS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21AAPL vs ALMS-0.21

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AAPL vs ALMS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/aapl-vs-alms.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aapl-vs-alms/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AAPL correlations · ALMS correlations