PairBook
HomeA › A vs LPA

A vs LPA: Correlation

How closely do Agilent Technologies (A) and Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4473.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are A and LPA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of A and LPA correlate at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.20 over 1 year against -0.26 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -4473.4 %².

Among the 33 assets we track against A, LPA sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #30. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with A ahead by 86.2 points (+33.9% versus -52.3%). Risk is not evenly split, since LPA carries 17.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

A vs LPA: side by side

A (Agilent Technologies)LPA (Logistic Properties of the Americas)
1-year return+33.9%-52.3%
5-year return-7.5%n/a
Volatility (ann.)31.0%540.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.98-0.73
Max drawdown (3Y)-35.3%-99.1%
Market cap$44.5B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)30.65.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Lower P/E: LPA 5.7 vs 30.6Smaller drawdown: A -35.3% vs -99.1%
-62%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). A · LPA

Year-by-year returns

YearALPA
2022-5.5%
2023-6.4%
2024-2.7%
2025+1.9%-74.5%
2026+16.6%+12.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are A and LPA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, A and LPA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between A and LPA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between A and LPA is -0.26 over 3 years, -0.20 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is LPA a good diversifier for A?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, A and LPA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/a-vs-lpa.json

A vs LPA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26A vs LPA-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![A vs LPA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/a-vs-lpa.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/a-vs-lpa/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: A correlations · LPA correlations