A vs ISPC: Correlation
Agilent Technologies (A) and iSpecimen Inc. (ISPC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are A and ISPC?
On 3 years of weekly data the A/ISPC correlation comes out at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.12 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -691.3 %².
ISPC is close to the least connected end of A's tracked universe, ranking #29 of 33. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with A ahead by 128.5 points (+33.9% versus -94.6%). Risk is not evenly split, since ISPC carries 3.9 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
A vs ISPC: side by side
| A (Agilent Technologies) | ISPC (iSpecimen Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +33.9% | -94.6% |
| 5-year return | -7.5% | -100.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 31.0% | 121.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.98 | 0.67 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -35.3% | -99.8% |
| Market cap | $44.5B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 30.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Health Care | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | A | ISPC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -5.5% | -82.4% |
| 2023 | -6.4% | -63.6% |
| 2024 | -2.7% | -73.5% |
| 2025 | +1.9% | -90.2% |
| 2026 | +16.6% | -84.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are A and ISPC good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between A and ISPC?
The A/ISPC correlation stands at -0.18 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.12, 5 years: -0.13), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is ISPC a good diversifier for A?
Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/a-vs-ispc.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/a-vs-ispc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: A correlations · ISPC correlations
